A Moonbat Smackdown

Daily, I read Imara and soundboyz. Usually I find more to agree with than not, but today was a little much. It seems that soundboyz honestly believes some of the Moonbat barking. As I was writing my comments, I realized that I needed too much space to do the article justice, so here it is. My comments are in italics.

Here we go....

So, you mean to tell me that President Bush ended up WINNING the 2000 election , even though Al Gore WON the popular vote?

Yes, that is called the Electoral College. That is how we elect a President and Vice-President in this Republic. Comes from the Constitution, Federal elections are decided by the States, not the populace. At least try to learn some history. By the way, Bush won the 2004 election with over 50% of the popular vote, something that Clinton never came close to doing. So I guess that you want to repeal everything that Clinton did in office?

So, you mean to tell me that it all boiled down to a state in which his brother, Jeb is the governor?

Yep, so what? If Al Gore had won his home state, he would have been President. Talk about a loser.

So, you mean to tell me that the Florida Supreme Court ruled that Bush was the winner because it was in the best interest of the country?

Well said, but exactly 100% false. The Florida Supreme Court interpreted Florida law incorrectly because they wanted Gore to win; slightly different from your post. The Federal Supreme Court overturned their ruling 7-2. Furthermore, through every recount done every way imaginable, Bush won every single one.

So, you mean to tell me that the National Security Advisor repeatedly try to warn the Bush Administration about people willing to use hijacked airplanes as missiles on targets in the U.S. , but was frequently ignored?

I have never heard that Condi said this and she was the National Security Advisor. She has adamantly denied any knowledge beforehand; personally I believe her because of her historical integrity. Maybe you are talking about Sandy Berger who was recently indicted on theft charges stemming from his shredding of documents pertaining to the Clinton Administration's handling of terrorism. Or worse still, maybe you just made this one up.

So, you mean to tell me that a PDB(Presidential daily briefing) was sitting on Bush's desk warning him about a potential 9/11 scenario , while he was clearing brush in Crawford Texas?

Presidential briefings are general information. There are not a whole lot of specifics about anything. Usually these are in memo form and offer no "eyes only" info. So, I'm guessing that this could have said something about a fifty foot tall Sta-Puft Marshmallow Man crushing churches and it wouldn't have mattered.

So, you mean to tell me that hours after 9/11 , the names, pictures , and information of all 19 hijackers were known and broadcasted on television, yet 9/11 could not be prevented?

Yea, it's called detective work. Look at the manifest and names. Then narrow it down to Arabs. Probably took a whopping six minutes.

So, you mean to tell me that we went into Iraq because Bush tried to link Saddam Hussein to 9/11?

Nope, the United States invaded Iraq because we are the damn UN police officer and we enforced the 14 resolutions that Iraq ignored. Bush asked if Saddam was involved with 9-11 and come to find out he was not in that specific incident. However, the numerous ties betwen Saddam and OBL that the 9-11 Commission pointed out, prove that there might still come a time when that evidence is uncovered. You see, criminals usually don't write down stuff like: 1. Get dumbasses to fly planes into buildings. 2. Get check from Saddam.

So, you mean to tell me that when they failed to link Iraq to 9/11, the Bush administration claimed that Iraq posed a THREAT to us with weapons of mass destruction?

Uh, no, the Democrats said that Bush said that. Bush said that he was going to enforce the UN resolutions. Bet you can't find that quote from Bush about an emminent threat.

So, you mean to tell me that when the U.N. was about to declare Iraq FREE of WMD, Bush rushed us to war with Iraq?

Uh, the UN was going to declare Iraq free of WMD's even though Saddam wouldn't let inspectors in until the United States had amassed an army on their border? Too little, too late. Let's make some glass!

So, you mean to tell me that the plan to invade Iraq was in the works since Bush 41, but was rejected as crazy and impractical, and also because there was no EXIT strategy?

Well, maybe the Clinton Administration was keeping that in reserve if Bill was actually charged with the rape of Juanita Broderick.

So, you mean to tell me that these same "Neo-Conservatives" that planned this war in Iraq since the 80's, are the SAME ones in KEY positions in the Bush 43 administration?

Yea, well when you can get the experienced veterans that know the business instead a bunch of Leftist appeasement monkeys, go for 'em. Seemed to work pretty well from where I'm standing. Oh, and they are Conservatives, Neo.

So, you mean to tell me that with all the evidence that has come out to show that the American people have been repeatedly LIED to , there is no call, or movement, to do anything about it?

Well, the American people seemed to come out and vote overwhelmingly against the liar, Kerry, so I guess something has been done. Oh, and he still hasn't signed the Form 180. What's up with that? Did he actually get court-martialed or is that just a rumor?

So, you mean to tell me that American Soldiers have been exposed as war criminals, and abusers of prisoners in Iraq, yet only "foot soldiers" are taking the blame, when the Administration stated early on in the war that they would NOT abide by the Geneva convention?

Well, no, we didn't sign the idiotic treaty forming an International Court. And the one war criminal that I am aware of, was sentenced to death last week. Yea, chunk a grenade into tents with your fellow soldiers and see what happens.

So, you mean to tell me that the U.S. is holding INNOCENT human beings in Guantanimo Bay, yet these human beings have NO rights or due process?

Innocent terrorists? Yea, that's right. Failure to follow the Geneva Convention in wartime causes you to lose any protections of the Convention.

So, you mean to tell me that these people being held in Gitmo are being subjected to inhumane and degrading torture and nothing is being done to stop this?

Yea, if you call three hots and a cot, torture. Hey, I'll stop that shit, if given the chance.

So, you mean to tell me that we appointed Chalibi as OIL MINISTER in Iraq, yet we claim that we are NOT after their OIL?

Uh, WTF? There were elections held in Iraq, a government was put in place and now they fill the cabinet. Please tell me that you don't think that we are manipulating things. Oh, well. To the victor, go the spoils. Bring on the free oil!

So, you mean to tell me that Bush "won" the 2004 elections because he "won" Ohio which heavily relied in electronic voting machines created by Diabolt,whose owner is a big Republican supporter of Bush, who "promised" him the win before hand?

It's Deibold, but yes Bush won handily, except in the urban areas, just as happened in every state across the country. Seems that morons flock to large cities. But everyone already knew that. You gotta be a dumbass to live in the same place as millions of other folks. Oh, and how does someone that only supplies 3% of the voting machines promise the election? Oh, he has faith in the American people. Most people knew the extent of Kerry's stupidity.

So, you mean to tell me that American Press no longer has the right to report the truth?

The Press is just now being forced to print the truth from as far back as Vietnam. Believe me, it's going to take many more blog outings of the lies of the press, but eventually the truth will begin to sift back into the MSM.

What ARE you telling me?

That obviously, you have some problems with this country and should seek asylum in some third world country that hates George Bush as much as you do.

.